S&H (was:Re: [sdiy] Vote for your favorite noise source)

[Sowa Roman]

If sampling clock wouldn't be random in the first place, the output
can be only aliased image of high speed saw. So depending on frequency
relation between two oscs it will be staircase up or down and other
easy to predict and control shapes.

Unless the S&H aperture jitter is about the time of high speed
saw cycle, but then randomness depends solely on S&H jitter
distribution that AFAIK is gaussian.

I better shut up and go home
Roman

__-----Original Message-----
__From: Michael Buchstaller [mailto:buchi at takeonetech.de]
__Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:33 PM
__To: synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
__Subject: Re: S&H (was:Re: [sdiy] Vote for your favorite noise source)
__
__
__>Well, I suppose you´re right. But for equal distribution, 
__you could just
__>sample an ordinary triangle oscillator, that runs with much higher
__>frequency than the sample rate (and out of sync of course).
__
__Wouldn´t a saw be better ?
__
__
__-Michael Buchstaller
__
__
__---------------------------------------------------------
__This message has been scanned for viruses by MIMESweeper.
__
__Wiadomosc zostala sprawdzona pod katem wirusow przez
__oprogramowanie MIMESweeper.
__