[sdiy] small VCO core

Tony Clark clark at andrews.edu
Tue May 28 17:21:11 CEST 2002


> Why sawtooth? My recent experiments show that it is much easier to shape
> other waveforms from a triangle core.
> Also, a triangle VCO doesn't have the problem with the sawtooth reset time.
> Mine stays in tune to over 20kHz, without any HF compensation whatsoever.

   Hi all,

   I originally did some LFOs this way, but of course I discovered that 
the glitch point in the sawtooth conversion basically made the waveform 
useless (unless you like that sort of thing!).
   I much prefer to use a sawtooth VCO core and then waveshape.  While 
the waveforms may not be as stable in higher frequencies, the VCO is 
_excellent_ in sub-audio modulation.
   As for sawtooth reset time, you can improve upon it using a variety of 
tricks such as a smaller integrating cap, plus speeding up the reset 
circuitry.  Using appropriately sized caps in strategic areas of the 
circuitry can reduce the reset glitches pretty well for audio-range 
applications.

   Tony

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
         The E-Music DIY Archive - New Site Coming Soon!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

"We wouldn't want to ship something that doesn't work"
   - Carl Stork, general manager, Microsoft Windows division
     Excerpt from EE Times April 2, 2001




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list