Odp: [sdiy] Call for opinions: Walsh Module

[Tim Ressel]

Roman,

That would be cool if I needed a few. But this thing
is gonna need 64 faders! Even with cheap 8-bit
8-channel DACs it'll be expensive.

I think the diode fader is the way to go.

--TR



--- Roman <modular at go2.pl> wrote:
> How about common multiplying DACs?
> Feed reference input with audio sugnal and you have
> digitally controlled fader.
> 
> R.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Tim Ressel <madhun2001 at yahoo.com>
> To: Seb Francis <seb at is-uk.com>
> Cc: <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [sdiy] Call for opinions: Walsh Module
> 
> 
> > Seb, 
> > 
> > Thanks, but I need digital potentiometers, not
> rotary
> > encoders. Think programmable fader.
> > 
> > --TR
> > 
> > --- Seb Francis <seb at is-uk.com> wrote:
> > > Tim Ressel wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Ouch! I just looked at the prices of digital
> pots.
> > > Oy!
> > > >
> > > 
> > > ALPS STEC16B 16mm rotary enoders 24 sine pulse
> per
> > > revolution
> > > CPC 87p each for 5+
> > > (SW01640 / SW01641 / SW01642 / SW01643)
> > > 
> > > Just get a PIC + Mux to read them and your away
> ...
> > > 
> > > Seb
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Yahoo! - We Remember
> > 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
> > http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute
> 


__________________________________________________
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute