[sdiy] Re: linear FM
Barry Klein
Barry.L.Klein at wdc.com
Thu Feb 6 17:54:16 CET 2003
I want to hear some discussion of how this is even used.
Striving for perfection is one thing but what does the "musician" really
want/need?
How about some sound samples?
Most of what I hear people do is bleep bleep boing anyway.... :-)
Barry
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Grenader [mailto:petergrenader at mksound.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:04 PM
To: harrybissell; ASSI
Cc: synth diy
Subject: Re: [sdiy] Re: linear FM
If it's at all encouraging, its WAY past my level of comprehension. But
hey, I get tickled when I get an LED to turn on (when I want it to).
- Peter
harrybissell wrote:
>
> Gentlemen....
>
> No bickering please.
>
> And there are some here (moi...) who are finding it difficult to keep up
> with the math chops... so if anyone wants to offer explanations of the
> technical terms, ideas, etc. please do so without fear of OFFENDING
> people.
>
> Those less proficient in the art will benefit from an open discussion of
> the topic.
>
> and hey... I don't get it all. This is running right on the edge of my
> comprehension... so be nice to the (advanced) newbies and feel
> free to offer patronizing explanations :^P
>
> H^) harry
>
> ASSI wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 05 February 2003 22:03, Ian Fritz wrote:
>>> The variable being integrated is current. An electronic device
>>> cannot integrate a frequency. This is nonsense.
>>
>> You and I are talking about different things it appears, so
>> interpreting what I'm saying indeed does not make sense interpreted in
>> your context.
>>
>> I am talking about integrating frequency and I mean it. I'm perfectly
>> aware that the frequency variable will be represented by a current and
>> the integration product a voltage when I try to implement that as an
>> analog system like the one you are talking about. That voltage variable
>> (representing phase) maps to another voltage variable which represents
>> the momentaneous amplitude of the oscillator.
>>
>>> I can assure you that you do not need to explain to us what phasors
>>> are.
>>
>> Sorry, I didn't meant to insult or patronize anyone. However my
>> difficulties to bring my original point across led me to believe that I
>> had to explain the terminology I'm using in more detail.
>>
>> Achim.
>> -- +<[ Q+ & WAVE#46 & microQkb Omega sonic heaven ]>+ --
>>
>> Q MIDI Implementation:
>> http://homepages.compuserve.de/Stromeko/QSysEx_preview.pdf
>
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list