[sdiy] Simmons sds

[Paul Maddox]

> > If it goes this route, it's dang close to a FatMan.

ermm, check out the MonowaveII, far better than a fatman, 3 oscs, 256
waveforms, 3 EGs, Sweepable filter poles, stereo DDL, patch memory and so
on..
Www.Modulus.Synth.net/mw2/

> Maybe I went a little too far. (Paul?)

thats the monowaveII..

> I'm wondering how much work it would be to add hard sync. I guess you've
got
> to check for a zero crossing as you generate each sample of the "sync-to"
> osc, which shouldn't be too much extra load on the DSP.

the hard part is it means a test/branch, something you try to avoid in DSP
as it gives an unpredictable number of instructions per loop (sometimes you
jump, sometimes you dont)

paul