Chris, thanks for all the data, but it doesn't really answer my question. Hassler, I was thinking along the same lines you mentioned, about sample rate being the possible culprit for the boundary. Perhaps I'll look around for an HP 200-C by Hewlett-Packard. On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Thomas Buckler <thomas.buckler@gmail.com>wrote: > I came up with a third by dividing 21,000 by 3. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [200e] Re: 261e or 259e capable of higher frequencies?
2008-09-28 by Thomas Buckler