200e

On Sep 28, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Thomas Buckler wrote:
> Chris, thanks for all the data, but it doesn't really answer my  
> question.


I was hoping to re-frame your question. Earlier, you said:

> It just makes no sense to me why roughly 2/3s, the majority of  
> possible
> pitches, are inaccessible
> to the composer.

This shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of pitch. (and  
sadly, the pun was intended)

I was hoping to point out that the PITCH range is pretty wide, at  
least as wide as acoustic instruments, and it is only missing about an  
octave and a half off of the high end of human hearing as far as  
fundamental pitches are concerned.

-C

Chris Muir
cbm@well.com	
http://www.xfade.com