200e

That raises another question, namely user modification of firmware(assuming one could steer clear of damaging stuff)
Yasi at one point very early on asked if anyone had created their own 259e wavetables, for instance. 


--- On Sun, 9/28/08, Thomas Buckler <thomas.buckler@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Thomas Buckler <thomas.buckler@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [200e] Re: 261e or 259e capable of higher frequencies?
> To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Sunday, September 28, 2008, 2:27 PM
> Chris, thanks for all the data, but it doesn't really
> answer my question.
> Hassler, I was thinking along the same lines you mentioned,
> about sample
> rate being the possible culprit for the boundary.
> 
> Perhaps I'll look around for an HP 200-C by
> Hewlett-Packard.
> 
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Thomas Buckler
> <thomas.buckler@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
> > I came up with a third by dividing 21,000 by 3.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]