i meant to comment on this but got lost in thinking about my selfish playing about! ;-] this is dead on and i agree 100% On Monday, September 29, 2008, at 01:21AM, "kkonkkrete" <kkonkkrete@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >Talking in Hz doesn't make sense because sensory JND's vary as a >function of the frequency. That's not a musical claim, it's just a >statement about the hair cells and basilar membrane in your cochlea. >So although +/-1 Hz is way above your frequency discrimination >threshold at 50 Hz, it is way below your frequency discrimination >threshold at 5000 Hz. Discussions of the range of human hearing >should be conducted in physiological (not physical) units. So in my >opinion, I don't think there is any meaningful sense in which 7kHz - >20kHz is 1/3 of the range of human hearing.
Message
Re: [200e] Re: 261e or 259e capable of higher frequencies?
2008-09-29 by Damon Menne
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.