Sorry for my misunderstanding. I was basing that assessment by observing the pitch modulation in the low frequency mode of the mod osc. It does clip at the top. --tom --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, "ezra buchla" <ezra.buchla@...> wrote: > > >> 261e's fundamental frequency is set to the top of its range, it can > >> still generate harmonics above the fundamental. > >> > > > > Via the waveshaper, yeah? If I had one beef with the 259e/261e it would be > > the FM in the > > higher frequency range. Set the fundamental to 6000 hz and fm it, the output > > will clip at > > 7040, therefore limiting the rich sidebands you might be used to on "other" > > synths. > > that's just not true. there is no frequency domain "clipping" at 7k. > the 261e primary osc only produces fundamentals up to a certain > frequency (its not actually 7040 despite the silkscreen; try > listening); this is indeed due to processor limitations; of course we > actually have to compute the waveform thousands of times faster than > the fundamental in order to produce a clean sinewave input to the > waveshaper. we could produce faster fundamentals but they would begin > life with artifacts even before waveshaping, and you would not like > that (or maybe you would...?) > > anyway, the waveform is actually being computed at 50k or 100k or > something, so pitch modulation will still produce high-frequency > sidebands. use the internal pitch modulation to avoid jitter. i'm > sorry abuot the external FM inputl; it's not useful for high frequency > stuff.... sorry sorry. personally i'm used to being able to process > arbitrary signals with FM, but i find that the 291e scratches this > itch. > > and yes, of course, of course, everything after the 261e sinewave is > analog, and the harmonic content added by waveshaping proceeds towards > the infinite for as far as you might care to take your analysis.... > > -eb >
Message
Re: 261e or 259e capable of higher frequencies?
2008-09-29 by tmeade1974
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.