On Dec 16, 2008, at 7:59 PM, derwskee wrote: > Looking at the 210 I am wondering what you get from the CV outputs if > you gang/mix/scale a bunch of CV inputs; site says they are "OR'd" and > assumption is that the one with the highest voltage is sent but if > they > are all fluctuating/changing do they jumpa around at the output? The site is wrong. The CVs are really mixed, not ORed. > As for the audio, did I see somone say the resolution is not such that > it works well for mixing of audio. As I look to expand my tiny > system I > am looking to get the most out of each module. The resolution is not the greatest, or maybe it's just that the curve is not great for audio, and it is a little noisy. FWIW, I'm using the audio section mostly as a matrix mixer for effects sends. It's a useful module, even with these issues, though. > Also, anyone have (2) 281's in a small system? I could see all sorts > of > uses as clocks, LFO's etc and combined with a SOU and possibly the > Quad > CV Processor a whole host of whacky CV outputs created. I have two, and wish I had room and funds for another. A 281 section is also makes a good pulse delay. - C Chris Muir cbm@well.com http://www.xfade.com
Message
Re: [200e] 210e as a "Real" Audio or CV Mixer?
2008-12-17 by Chris Muir
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.