Jon, thanks for your detailed explanation! You confirm my "fear" that it is very hard (or at least limiting) to get a "completely storable modular system" even with the 200e! We know that well known people like Richard Lainhart (and probably Alessandro Cortini) work live with a 200e, question was how they handle the challenge to be able to quickly (!) recall different "complete patches". Frank --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, jon schatz <jon@...> wrote: > > > On Jun 5, 2009, at 4:10 PM, fhserge wrote: > > any further explanation on your side? Would be happy to be > > enlightened on that matter... > > so your original email was about "complete patch storage". you > mentioned the limited number of cv and audio outs on the 210e and > questioned getting a second one. > > my answer was sort of in jest. in my usage patterns i hardly ever > setup patches with only 5 audio / cv routings. even with certain hard- > coded setups (all my 281e outputs shorted to 292e inputs, all the 292e > ouputs into all the 227e inputs, etc) i need more than 5 extra cables > to recall a preset. so then getting a second (or a third!) 210e seems > like a solution but eventually i'm dealing with so many outputs / > inputs on those modules that i need some sort of module to simplify > them. hence, one more 210e. > > i think it's a losing battle to truly come up with a system of presets > that solely uses the 210e and doesn't require manual patching around > unless you've only get 2 or 3 modules (and even then, really hard). > > thanks, > > -jon > "There are no differences but differences of degree between different > degrees > of difference and no difference." > - James, William. "Subjective Effects of Nitrous Oxide." Mind. 1882; > Vol 7. >
Message
Re: Who uses the "store" feature of the 200e
2009-06-05 by fhserge
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.