200e

Some comments on Ezra's comments

>> > Though the 258v was incredibly tempting I decided not to try to get
>> > one because I didn't want something I'd be surely using very
>> > frequently to be a module without the "e" features.
>> >
>>
>> if (as i suppose) it closely resembles the original 258, then it's  
>> a very
>> useful thing for anyone to have, all by itself..

Oh and I have a several Plan B M15 VCOs right now so while not  
exactly the same or in a form factor as compatible I can work with  
VCOs with similar capabilities outside of  the 200e format such as  
Serge's very CV-able approach to slews.
>>
>> > I am disappointed by the storage limit of one 210e as I was  
>> thinking
>> > about 2. I have one on order for 6 months, hopefully coming very  
>> soon
>> > and have used one before on someone else's system ...so I'm  
>> about to
>> > develop my working methods rather than have any real insight to
>> > report. I guess it's still quite possible to just use the module's
>> > internal memory on more than one 210e without card storage,  
>> correct?
>> > That's something I'm sure I could live with though it's annoying.
>> >
>>
>> you're correct. people have different use patterns; personally  
>> i've never
>> even thought about needing to use a preset card. i guess if you  
>> really rely
>> on presets for performance or something, it would be necessary. i  
>> still
>> wouldn't like relying on a tiny piece of portable flash memory to  
>> store my
>> all-important presets, any more than i would keep a single copy of  
>> all my
>> software projects on a single USB as always, if a synth makes a sound
>> you like it's a good idea to record it....

Again I can't really say since I don't have mine yet.
I was just thinking it's likely a really huge chore to use paper or  
something if I needed to offload the data of a second 210e if I  
needed or wanted to.

Then again I'm still stoked about working with the module despite  
that limitation.

nick