Yahoo Groups archive

200e

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:38 UTC

Message

Re: [200e] Re: COMPARISONS..

2011-01-05 by Don Kim

I had the E350 a while back, before I had any Buchla.  I don't remember it
being able to morph between 2 waveforms like the 259e, I could be wrong tho.
 The FM, I prefer the 259e by far, possibly due to having a built in FM
index, but I rarely, if at all, used the E350 with FM, I just didn't like
how it sounded.  The format waveforms are really nice tho.  I think the E350
has the edge over the 259e in format waveforms, but I've gotten some nice
formant sounds from the 259e also, just not as easily as calling up a bank.
 I think there's not too much overlap between the 350 and 259e tho, other
than that they are both morphing wavetable oscillators.  I wouldn't say it's
the module to start a euro system, but if you have a euro system and like
wavetables, it's definately worth picking up.

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, michael <m@silentspring.net> wrote:

>
>
> the morphing terrarium sounds stellar from the samples floating about. a
> bit step-y but it seems to have a peculiar vocal quality.
>
> m.
>
>
> --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com <200e%40yahoogroups.com>, "cuari7" <cuari7@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Anybody on this forum has had the chance to compare the 259e with the
> MOTM Morphing Terrarium? The latter is a very interesting wavetable
> oscillator with the advantage of much less aliasing....and a lower price.
> >
> >
> > jd
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.