I had the E350 a while back, before I had any Buchla. I don't remember it being able to morph between 2 waveforms like the 259e, I could be wrong tho. The FM, I prefer the 259e by far, possibly due to having a built in FM index, but I rarely, if at all, used the E350 with FM, I just didn't like how it sounded. The format waveforms are really nice tho. I think the E350 has the edge over the 259e in format waveforms, but I've gotten some nice formant sounds from the 259e also, just not as easily as calling up a bank. I think there's not too much overlap between the 350 and 259e tho, other than that they are both morphing wavetable oscillators. I wouldn't say it's the module to start a euro system, but if you have a euro system and like wavetables, it's definately worth picking up. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:13 PM, michael <m@silentspring.net> wrote: > > > the morphing terrarium sounds stellar from the samples floating about. a > bit step-y but it seems to have a peculiar vocal quality. > > m. > > > --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com <200e%40yahoogroups.com>, "cuari7" <cuari7@...> > wrote: > > > > Anybody on this forum has had the chance to compare the 259e with the > MOTM Morphing Terrarium? The latter is a very interesting wavetable > oscillator with the advantage of much less aliasing....and a lower price. > > > > > > jd > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [200e] Re: COMPARISONS..
2011-01-05 by Don Kim
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.