I don't know how many of you have read this or are aware of its existence but there's an entry for the 200e on Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/200e A few shortcomings and work-arounds are mentioned which I'd like some updates or clarifications on, if possible. I just thought it would be worthwhile to get the latest data and to dispel any false notions that may be derived from that page. Here are the two I'm most interested in hearing more about and they concern the 261e: 1) The bad news is that it is not obvious how to get similarly good-sounding results by routing the modulation oscillator output signal into the "fm in" signal input of the 261e (or the 259e for that matter). Instead of a pleasing FM tone, the sound gets really grainy as soon as the knob related to the "fm in" input is moved beyond its zero position. This is very unfortunate, because if this worked as expected, one could build some complex, but controlled, FM operators. I have found one work-around which suggests an error in design and/or implementation: by attenuating the modulation output (which can be accomplished by routing it through a 210e Control and Signal Router attenuating the connection a few clicks below unity), results are more in line with expectations. For now, absent any other information or known work-arounds, the best way to do conventional and controlled FM is to use the internal connections, which means that two-operator FM synthesis is the order of the day. 2) Another source of confusion for me is why, when applying audio-rate frequency modulation to the principal oscillator, the pitch appears to go sharp or flat. I'd expect the pitch to remain stable and only the timbre to change. Thanks!
Message
200e Wikipedia entry
2008-04-04 by Matt Carpenter
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.