200e

hey, a reminder: it may be worthwhile to use the 200e_beta group for
technical problems; i tend to respond pretty fast.

i'm saying this because i don't have as much time or resources as i'd like
to address such problems (i don't actually "work" at B&A); and it's my
theory that using the group will give users a chance to answer each other's
questions, and to help me+don+yasi glean a better overall pitcure of what
issues are most widespread, and to distribute troubleshooting information
most efficiently.

if you're a 200e owner (1st or 2nd or 3rd on nth-hand) and you're not on the
beta list, please visit http://groups.google.com/group/200e_beta/ and
request an add.

as for the elitism comment, i truly do appreciate and sympathize with that
perspective, but i think it's incomplete and overly severe. i get a lot of
anonymous vitriol and pique in my inbox already, and i don't always deal
with it very well. so if the signal/noise ratio on the 200e yahoo group goes
down i will simply have to stop reading and responding to it, just like i
don't read AH or any other synth forums; i find them, without exception,
upsetting and a waste of time. i'd have to focus all my attention on the
200e_beta group, which doesn't even have publicly visible archives...

"elitism" is the philsophy that society would be best served by catering
exclusively to the needs of the powerful, wealthy, or talented. this is a
repellent concept. i must, however, accept the "pragmatic" realization that
time and patience is limited compared to the internet's infinite cpacity to
produce comabtive bullshit.

of course, my email address is still public knowledge; feel free to ask
questions about the 200e or whatever; many people do...

-eb


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

i got some replies to this, so:

sorry, i truly didn't mean to dis. actually it seems like the great majority
people on AH and especially muff wiggler, etc. are really really nice and
worth talking to. i just personally find those forums too exhausting to wade
through; my own problem.

if anyone thinks that it'd make the 200e newsgroup more USEFUL to open it to
whomever... then by all means! it's not my group, and actually i had no idea
it was restricted to 200e owners until this week.

i'd like to meet more people, i just don't need to meet any more jerks.

i'm also interested in building accessible technology, so how bout this for
an offer: send me a software concept and i will make it...

 just like i don't read AH or any other synth forums; i find them, without
> exception, upsetting and a waste of time. i'd have to focus all my attention
> on the 200e_beta group, which doesn't even have publicly visible archives...
>
> "elitism" is the philsophy that society would be best served by catering
> exclusively to the needs of the powerful, wealthy, or talented. this is a
> repellent concept. i must, however, accept the "pragmatic" realization that
> time and patience is limited compared to the internet's infinite cpacity to
> produce comabtive bullshit.
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I don't people realize the extent to which the list would change should an open membership policy be adopted.
It fluctuates (usually depending on how many 200e youtube videos are published in any given month), but I estimate the ratio of non-user to user requests can be as high as 20:1. I am not exactly comfortable sitting in judgment of what is often a one line request (or three word - such as "patch-cable fetishist" or "ME-WANTY-BUCHLA") as a method of determing whether someone is a worthy candidate, but the truth is, it seems the ones I don't correctly identify the first time often send a second request. 

I'm sure there are those who might make interesting contributions even as non-users/owners. However currently, this seems to be the best method of balancing the amount of bullsh!t in our inboxes.If one searches the AH archives, a hugh amount of 200e information will
be found, but only a tiny fraction is useful to someone with an
instrument in front of them.

I've heard from several of you predominantly in support of this method of selection, and my inbox is always open...

Respectfully yours,

Jason R. Butcher





________________________________

From: ezra buchla <ezra.buchla@gmail.com>
To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 10:12:47 PM
Subject: [200e] Re: lists





i got some replies to this, so:

sorry, i truly didn't mean to dis. actually it seems like the great majority
people on AH and especially muff wiggler, etc. are really really nice and
worth talking to. i just personally find those forums too exhausting to wade
through; my own problem.

if anyone thinks that it'd make the 200e newsgroup more USEFUL to open it to
whomever... then by all means! it's not my group, and actually i had no idea
it was restricted to 200e owners until this week.

i'd like to meet more people, i just don't need to meet any more jerks.

i'm also interested in building accessible technology, so how bout this for
an offer: send me a software concept and i will make it...

just like i don't read AH or any other synth forums; i find them, without
> exception, upsetting and a waste of time. i'd have to focus all my attention
> on the 200e_beta group, which doesn't even have publicly visible archives...
>
> "elitism" is the philsophy that society would be best served by catering
> exclusively to the needs of the powerful, wealthy, or talented. this is a
> repellent concept. i must, however, accept the "pragmatic" realization that
> time and patience is limited compared to the internet's infinite cpacity to
> produce comabtive bullshit.
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


   


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

FWIW the Serge Yahoo list is largely unmoderated, anyone can join and we
have an excellent signal to noise ratio.
I personally don't agree with the arguments for prohibiting membership to
this list.
I see it more as a matter of excluding potential owners from a vital source
of information on the 200e that isn't accessible any other way.

Matt

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Jason Butcher <fastheadache@yahoo.com>wrote:

>
>
> I don't people realize the extent to which the list would change should an
> open membership policy be adopted.
> It fluctuates (usually depending on how many 200e youtube videos are
> published in any given month), but I estimate the ratio of non-user to user
> requests can be as high as 20:1. I am not exactly comfortable sitting in
> judgment of what is often a one line request (or three word - such as
> "patch-cable fetishist" or "ME-WANTY-BUCHLA") as a method of determing
> whether someone is a worthy candidate, but the truth is, it seems the ones I
> don't correctly identify the first time often send a second request.
>
> I'm sure there are those who might make interesting contributions even as
> non-users/owners. However currently, this seems to be the best method of
> balancing the amount of bullsh!t in our inboxes.If one searches the AH
> archives, a hugh amount of 200e information will
> be found, but only a tiny fraction is useful to someone with an
> instrument in front of them.
>
> I've heard from several of you predominantly in support of this method of
> selection, and my inbox is always open...
>
> Respectfully yours,
>
> Jason R. Butcher
>
> ________________________________
> From: ezra buchla <ezra.buchla@gmail.com <ezra.buchla%40gmail.com>>
> To: 200e@yahoogroups.com <200e%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2009 10:12:47 PM
> Subject: [200e] Re: lists
>
> i got some replies to this, so:
>
> sorry, i truly didn't mean to dis. actually it seems like the great
> majority
> people on AH and especially muff wiggler, etc. are really really nice and
> worth talking to. i just personally find those forums too exhausting to
> wade
> through; my own problem.
>
> if anyone thinks that it'd make the 200e newsgroup more USEFUL to open it
> to
> whomever... then by all means! it's not my group, and actually i had no
> idea
> it was restricted to 200e owners until this week.
>
> i'd like to meet more people, i just don't need to meet any more jerks.
>
> i'm also interested in building accessible technology, so how bout this for
> an offer: send me a software concept and i will make it...
>
> just like i don't read AH or any other synth forums; i find them, without
> > exception, upsetting and a waste of time. i'd have to focus all my
> attention
> > on the 200e_beta group, which doesn't even have publicly visible
> archives...
> >
> > "elitism" is the philsophy that society would be best served by catering
> > exclusively to the needs of the powerful, wealthy, or talented. this is a
> > repellent concept. i must, however, accept the "pragmatic" realization
> that
> > time and patience is limited compared to the internet's infinite cpacity
> to
> > produce comabtive bullshit.
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Help me to understand the 291e please. 

My problem is to understand how i sync the 250 with the 291e. 
What i done so far is. 


250 pulse -> 291e adv.
set every stage of the 291e to pulse. 


The Stage Numbers over jump some stages randomly. Is this a Problem of my T is set to 0.01?  If i set T to 0.10 it does not jump? But i was thinking that T is for the Free Mode? 

Why does Stop, Enbl and Cyle does the same? Jump to stage 1
What is the difference ?

What is the difference between big and smal letters ( A/a,  B/b, F/f)

Is there a special trick where i can edit all 8 steps ? (Like with the 250)


Thank you!