200e

I wanted to test the 210e and see if it can pass signals from both directions, but thought to ask the group first, before I fry my system!

The question is; can I use the 5 outputs of the 210e as inputs, and use the 8 inputs as outs? It seems as though I am always using just a few inputs and wishing I had more outs. Will reverse wiring damage the module or even work???

it won't do damage, but it also won't work.
i've had the same feeling, sometimes, about input count vs output count. i
think it's possbile to convert them in firmware...

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:22 AM, prscrptn <prscrptn@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> I wanted to test the 210e and see if it can pass signals from both
> directions, but thought to ask the group first, before I fry my system!
>
> The question is; can I use the 5 outputs of the 210e as inputs, and use the
> 8 inputs as outs? It seems as though I am always using just a few inputs and
> wishing I had more outs. Will reverse wiring damage the module or even
> work???
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

fortunately if it is a firmware option to be implemented, it is no  
problem to mount the module upside down.  ;-]

On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:17 PM, ezra buchla wrote:

>
>
> it won't do damage, but it also won't work.
> i've had the same feeling, sometimes, about input count vs output  
> count. i
> think it's possbile to convert them in firmware...
>

sideways.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:20 PM, damon <damon@mac.com> wrote:

>
>
> fortunately if it is a firmware option to be implemented, it is no
> problem to mount the module upside down. ;-]
>
>
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:17 PM, ezra buchla wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > it won't do damage, but it also won't work.
> > i've had the same feeling, sometimes, about input count vs output
> > count. i
> > think it's possbile to convert them in firmware...
> >
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

and backwards.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ezra buchla <ezra.buchla@gmail.com> wrote:

> sideways.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:20 PM, damon <damon@mac.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> fortunately if it is a firmware option to be implemented, it is no
>> problem to mount the module upside down. ;-]
>>
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:17 PM, ezra buchla wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > it won't do damage, but it also won't work.
>> > i've had the same feeling, sometimes, about input count vs output
>> > count. i
>> > think it's possbile to convert them in firmware...
>> >
>>
>>  
>>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

trumped!

On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:30 PM, ezra buchla wrote:

>
>
> and backwards.
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ezra buchla  
> <ezra.buchla@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > sideways.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:20 PM, damon <damon@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> fortunately if it is a firmware option to be implemented, it is no
> >> problem to mount the module upside down. ;-]
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:17 PM, ezra buchla wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > it won't do damage, but it also won't work.
> >> > i've had the same feeling, sometimes, about input count vs output
> >> > count. i
> >> > think it's possbile to convert them in firmware...
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

Thanks everyone for the input/output :)


--- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, damon <damon@...> wrote:

>
> trumped!
> 
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:30 PM, ezra buchla wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > and backwards.
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ezra buchla  
> > <ezra.buchla@...> wrote:
> >
> > > sideways.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:20 PM, damon <damon@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> fortunately if it is a firmware option to be implemented, it is no
> > >> problem to mount the module upside down. ;-]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Jun 19, 2009, at 3:17 PM, ezra buchla wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > it won't do damage, but it also won't work.
> > >> > i've had the same feeling, sometimes, about input count vs output
> > >> > count. i
> > >> > think it's possbile to convert them in firmware...
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>