>
> i've used prog calcs since the hp55 and the ti57/59 and i find the hp50 an
> absolute nightmare to use--only an engineer would need it enough to put up
> having to use it. i'm not an engineer, but i'm a computer hobbyist from way
> back and am nearly immune to pain.
> i also have the ti89 titanium and it is no walk in the park either in that
> even if they put pretty icons of the apps in a menu, once you're in that app
> you still have to go look up what it wants for inputs and how to generate
> output.
>
> hp used to be renowned for their quality and it was a sad day to see 'made
> in singapore' on an hp27s i bought although it's still one of my favorite
> calculators as to operation even though it literally eats expensive
> batteries and you can barely see the display. i wonder if any of the folks
> praising the 'quality' of the hp50 have even worked on an hp35, 45, 55 &c.
> the new hp35 're-issue' was a welcome attempt and it indeed brings back fond
> memories of when hp wrote the book on calculator quality, but the interface
> and programming are not good and i myself found a bug in it and when it
> comes down to me finding a bug hp missed, they are indeed in trouble.
>
> anyway, why is he bitching so much i hear you say? i use symbolic algebra on
> both the ti and the hp and the hp50 is worth every penny for symbolic
> algebra and the equation library alone. but i'm getting way too old to
> memorize all these methods of keeping track of saving personal equations and
> adding and manipulating libraries. perhaps if i used the calculators on a
> daily basis i could keep up with all that, but just grabbing it once or
> twice a week to run some scenarios i'm reading about in a book i've gotten
> frustrated with having to go look up the simplest of operations. the ti89 is
> hardly any better and the keys and display are not as good as the hp50.
>
> an analogy lies in ham radio handheld radios which are barely larger than a
> cigarette pack and have hundreds of modes and settings and functions and
> host rarely more than a telephone keypad and a few stray function keys. no
> one can remember all these operations either, but there are computer
> programs that are marvels of simplicity--you hook your handheld via usb and
> set it up the way you want it via the computer and then you only have to
> remember a minimum of keystrokes out in the field or there's usually no
> problem finding a laptop so you can re-program if needed.
>
> and that's my complaint, why aren't t simple computer interfaces available
> for the calculators? the only ones i've found so far are barely more than
> file transfer, backup, or to run some simple commands. i want a program
> where i can simply type 'a=b/c' and tell it to re-arrange for 'c'. on the
> hp50 i have to take into account what mode i'm in, then i have to remember
> whether i have to put the input on the stack or not, and when to issue an
> 'isolate' command that is godknows where. and whether to delimit my entry,
> and, if so, with what characters. i can't remember what the procedure is on
> the ti59, but i know it's not intuitive either as i have to look up how to
> do it each time.
>
> /guy
>
>
>