brofjw a \ufffdcrit : > > Hi! I just joined. I don't have an AN1x but I actually DO have the > Yamaha EX7. Is it true that the VA section of the EX7 is identical to > the AN1x? If so, maybe I can learn things by tuning in to this group. > First of all, I have the EX7 not its bigger brother the EX5. The EX5 > supposedly has physical modeling on top of a VA section (AN1x engine) > and also the ROM-based synth engine. Now, I see that the AN1x has been > referred to as a physical modeling synth...so how does all this pan > out, considering what is said about the EX7 and EX5? I currently use a > Z1 as my physical modeling synth. It does great strings, great basses, > decent brass, and some cool bells and percussion sounds (i.e. marimbas > and steel drums). I also think the Z1 is a great VA. So why does > virtual analog and physical modeling seem to get put in the same box > so much with these synths? Is there a difference? How does the AN1x > fit in to all this and physical modeling and comparison to my Z1? > Both "physical modeling" and "virtual analog" are digital techniques aimed at the emulation of the analog synths of yesterday. To say it quickly the classic triangle - square - sine - sawtooth waveforms are stored in a ROM and cross a DSP that does all the filtering, amplification ... effects job. With its physical modeling Yamaha claims to reproduce the minor flaws, imperfections and instabilities of a pure analog synth, imperfections that have of course an effect on the sound. For exemple the saw can be more "triangular" or a bit rounded on high or low notes with a real analog oscillator, a digital oscillator will issue a perfect saw on all its frequency range. On the AN1x you have for example an "edge" parameter, giving a more or less vertical edge.I suppose others manufacturers use similar tricks with different names ...or not. I don't know your synths, but i have an AN1x. IMHO it is very close soundwise to the "pretty old things", at least those that i have heard live (Juno and Prophet 5), with more polyphony but less user friendly. Cheers. J.F. > > >
Message
Re: [AN1x] I don't HAVE an AN1x, but...
2010-06-16 by Jeff
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.