Joel wrote: >From: joel <mango@...> >Cool. >Though i've never used .mid to transfer patches to my synth, >always use the "standard" synth protocol (in the an1x's case: .an1) >But perhaps some time you could explain it. :) >I would be afraid to mess up or even lose my own patches, (yes i know, i >should >make a backup first i guess, haven't done that so far though.. so that's >going to >be a first time too, for the an1x at least), but besides that, i thought >.mid was >generally meant to be used only as songs for midisequencer programs or >hardwarez >midisequencers. > Hi Joel, So to say,if you have found "the ultimate" voice and you like to share it with others in the form of **.an1,then you have to send a whole bank with one ultimate and 127 initvoices total 220Kb.The simple form_.MID file or_.SysEx file is in that case very useful,mostly less in bytes.My experience is that on the WWW.you can find lots of synth- patches imbedded in banks in all kinds of formats due to the different editors and that for PC and Mac.So I prefer in that case the universal .MID form. BUT in this case I agree with you because there is the beautiful Yamaha AN1xEdit 1.02 for free,for PC and Mac with saved bankdata interchangeable!Double klick on the patch- name sends this patch to both editmemory's,computer and synth.Select a patch and <send>, you overwrite the patch in the synth with the same number.As you already should know. Of course you can save single patchdata without a number as sysexfile in a homemade lib. I find all this not so important as the fact that we can share our work on the AN1x. So let's do that. Regards,Joop
Message
Re: regular AN1x patch-challenge
2000-02-11 by Joop de Meij
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.