I've heard similar comments from people who've had experience using both Mackie and Beringer products. All the negative feedback (cheap construction, breaking down, noise) convinced me to get a Mackie 1642 instead of a Beringer mixer. I don't know much about their f/x units, though. Philip --- jondl <jondl@...> wrote: > > > Peter Korsten wrote: > > > > jondl shared with us: > > > > > > I have the latest 'junk' mail flier from GC and > I noticed the prices on > > > ALL the Behringer Dynamic Processors, Effects > modules (including the one > > > you purchased), along with their mixer's are > VERY attractive. What's up > > > with that? Is this some new trend I've missed > out on? Are they trying > > > to fill the niche Alesis and Mackie seem to be > moving away from? > > > > There are those who state that Behringer > shamelessly copies Mackie > > and other designs, at a lower price but also at a > lower quality. > > You might want to ask around a bit, before you > jump on the bandwagon, > > especially concerning what problems people have > had with Behringer > > desks. > > > > - Peter > > Really? I did not know that! I'm not in market for > one - today - but > those prices definitely catch your attention. I'm > unclear on exactly > what the Behringer reputation is suppose to be?! At > one time, a few > years ago, I thought they were promoting a more > exclusive market image - > at least here in the U.S. Now it seems they're > shooting for the price > conscious consumer. > > > It will be interesting to hear what Todd has to say > about his new plaything! > > Jon > > -- > http://www.jdlx-musique.com/ > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [AN1x-list] Behringer Stuff (was AN1x vs. Access b)
2000-04-10 by Philip
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.