> Well, more energy don't means more bandwith. Right - not always but it can imply that because, if higher frequencies aren't there to begin with, then there is no energy required to produce them. Conversely, if there are higher frequencies then they will require energy to be produced. (Actually my question about the 20 -20,000 Hz range was included in anticipation of that response.) >Synth designers tends to increase the region slightly below the least possible frequencies of their engine as a psycho accoustical trick to mask the lack bandwidth anyway a trained ear will recognise that. That's why some VAs sound that harsh... Junos have a built-in sub bass boost. (I think.) > > What are you saying the bandwidth of > > typical analog oscillators are - In excess of 20 - 20,000 Hz (?) > > Why not? If your speakers can do that, there's no bandwidth or sampling frequency I was wondering what the actual frequency range is of analog oscillators that were used in popular analog synhtesizers - not the theoretical limit. > Well.. I guess you rather like synths like Juno, it at least would fit to the description of sound you like. Anyway, it's rather soft sounding compared most of the analog synths I know. So I think it's rather a matter of taste I do tend to like soft rather than hard sounding synths and that is indeed why I didn't like the Evolver. For people that like screaming/ripping leads, the Evolver would be great. Junos or "The Japanese Sound" in general is usually described as bright (as analogs go) compared the "The American Sound" that includes Moogs, SCI and, ironically, The Korg Poly-6. >than a sign of analog sound... Well, I guess the question of what other quality/qualities make a synth sound analog is so wide open to subjectivity that it would be another long topic or thread : )
Message
Re: [AN1x] Aliasing
2005-04-12 by Dan