Behrooz wrote: > I am currently writing my programs with Bascom-AVR, they turned out to > be rather big (+1400 lines, including +35 subs). It still works and is > admirably simple( though seems a little slow and needs big stack size.) > I am about to add much more code and I am worry if the whole program > become too slow or reach stack size limit?! > > So my questions are: > 1- > Since I don't have very much spare time (as a hobbyist)in learning new > programming language(and my fear of dealing with complex hardware > details), do you think it is better for me to stick to the Bascom-Avr > with my growing program size, or not?? > > 2- > If not, what is my best option? I saw good books on teaching > CodeVision > in book stores, but I read on the internet that WinAvr has alot more > piece of code on the net (I used to copy-paste those pieces to my > bascom and it was helpful, so more code samples may be decisive) > Which one has less bug and is more common among C programers? > > 3- > Is the C language exactly the same for WinAvr and CodeVision? Are C and > C ANSI Identical? (sorry if specially the last question seems very > basic) If you search the archives, you'll find codevision has some very fundamental parts of C unimplemented. Do the same tests to see if it's been fixed (it's been broken for 5+ years).
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] WinAvr or CodeVision, which one is more public?
2008-01-20 by Russell Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.