Thanks Philippe, but an online document would be more useful to me. A simple google search returned this one and I found it interesting, AVR related: http://www.avrfreaks.net/index.php? module=FreaksArticles&func=downloadArticle&id=14 Behrooz --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Philippe Habib" <phabib@...> wrote: > > I have a book that does a great job of explaining this, but its at home. If > there is interest I can dig up the title. I used it as the textbook for an > embedded programming course I took years ago. > > -----Original Message----- > From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf > Of subscriptions@... > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 9:27 AM > To: avr-chat@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: WinAvr or CodeVision, which one is more public? > > David VanHorn Wrote > >> U talked of RTOS. Never heared of it before, but my MCU needed to > >> control RH, light level and temperature real time and show them on > >> LCD, so I thought and then I made for myself a sort of virtual multi- > >> tasking procedure, for example: > >> > >> Do > >> Gosub v > >> Gosub w > >> Gosub x > >> Gosub y > >> Gosub z > >> Loop > >> End > >> > > > >This is the guts of a cooperative multitasker. > > A simple co-operative multitasker. This particular kind is often referred > to as a super loop and is simple enough that some object to it being > referred to as a multitasker. They prefer to think of it as a single task > state machine. There is a grey area here. > > Time for a little RTOS taxonomy I think > > RTOS's can be classified as > > pre-emptive or co-operative > single stack (run to completion) or multiple stack > round-robin or priority > > There are other characteristics but I think these are the most important > and these characteristics are independent. Independence does not mean you > can change just one item in any particular implementation just that you can > implement any combination. > > The above is a co-operative, round-robin, single stack multitasker. > > pre-emptive systems bring in the ability to interrupt the current task at > any time but also need to be able to protect critical sections from being > interrupted by other tasks. Co-operative systems generally remove the need > to implement as many safeguards but their responsiveness and the > granularity of tasks falls completely on the programmers shoulder showing > up in the task breakdown itself. > > Single stack systems use only a single stack (obviously) and thus have > simpler memory management and task switching. Multiple stacks allow tasks > to block waiting for resources or data. > > Round-robin provides simple fairness. Priority based allows more frequent > and/or more important tasks first access improving responsiveness if done > correctly. > > Other characteristics include types of IPC, memory allocation, device > driver model (if any), task creation .... > > Robert > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > myhosting.com - Premium MicrosoftR WindowsR and Linux web and application > hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.9/1237 - Release Date: 1/22/2008 > 11:04 AM >
Message
Re: WinAvr or CodeVision, which one is more public?
2008-01-23 by Behrooz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.