AVR-Chat

Don't worry about it.  To live on the 'net you need to grown thicker 
skin.  There is _always_ someone who wants to instruct us all not to 
top-post.  Like the teachers who taught us english speakers that we must 
NEVER split an infinitive (which we can very easily do [and I just 
did]), they are simply attached to a habit that does not always make 
sense.  Top post all you want - I myself get tired of wading through 
increasingly difficult to deal with >>> to get to the answer somewhere 
near the bottom of a 20 page thread...  This isn't USENET me' lads.

IMO,
DLC

Sander Pool wrote:
> If you could stick to the subject I'd continue the conversation but 
> since you feel you need to 'strengthen' your argument by berating my 
> posting style I'll bow out.
> 
>     Sander
> 
> David Kelly wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 22, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Sander Pool top-posted:
>>
>>
>>
>> Top-posting is bad because chronological order english is written left
>> to right, top to bottom. That which is said last does not belong
>> before that which prompted its saying.
>>
>> --
>> David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net <mailto:dkelly%40HiWAAY.net>
>>
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

-- 
-------------------------------------------------
Dennis Clark          TTT Enterprises
www.techtoystoday.com
-------------------------------------------------