On Jun 17, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Philippe Habib wrote: > In my case, it is required. The fear is that if the micro dies in > such a way that the watchdog doesn't work either you'd be in trouble, > so you have an external watchdog which does the reset. You also have > some other way of detecting a dead micro and then arrange to fail in > a "good" way. So its based on fear rather than fact? Fear that the watchdog is implemented as a software function that will fail the same way when/if the CPU fails? But if that was the case wouldn't the CPU be smoked and beyond recovery via reset? -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re:AVR & Automation
2008-06-18 by David Kelly
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.