Generally speaking, more inductance is better. In reality, more inductance means also more resistance, and more interwinding capacitance. So, in a given system, over a range of similar type inductors, one particular inductor value will perform best. If you have a bulk supply available at higher voltage, you might use a separate linear regulator to supply this pin. Their PSRR figures vary, but some pretty high values are available. I'm using the separate regulator approach in an extreme low light video camera. I use two ISL-9000 chips, which have PSRRs at about 90dB. They are fed by a switcher which outputs just enough voltage to keep the ISL-9000 in regulation (keeping my efficiency high), and runs in the frequency range where the ISL-9000 has maximum PSRR. The switcher is also very well filtered. In the camera chip, there are two digital supplies, and two analog supplies, so I use one ISL-9000 for digital, and one for analog. The camera chip has NO PSRR on the sensitive analog supply pins, so 1mV of noise there translates to 1 bit of noise in the picture. The ISL-9000 is the best regulator I've found for PSRR, it beats anything that Linear is producing, and AFAIK anything from National, TI, etc. Engineering IS the art of compromise. Cost, size, weight, complexity.. Figure your priorities, and evaluate different approaches. As far as the inductor again, I have also used a 1 ohm resistor, and a high quality cap.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Inductor at AVCC
2008-10-27 by David VanHorn
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.