Roy makes a good point about skin effect. Forgot about that. Could be part of your excessive impedance. Jim Wagner On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:25 PM, Roy E. Burrage wrote: > Done the exploding wire deal Dave, both intentionally and non. > > 1. How are you measuring your shunt voltage and waveform? A scope I > presume. > > 2. Your shunt will be somewhat inductive at these frequencies and > currents. > > 3. Your frequency components will appear because of the pulsed > waveform, so you'll need to be aware of that. > > 4. Have you tried to cancel fields by running the cable into and out > of > your shunt in opposite directions? At these kinds of currents, > physical > placement of the wires will have an affect. For example; we built a > multi-station circuit breaker calibration system for distribution > transformers, substation types up to 2500 amps, some years ago and the > way we had to match station impedances was to change the routing of > the > 350 MCM cables. To achieve 0.25% system accuracy this was no minor > accomplishment and the station impedances had to be matched even > better > than this. > > 5. Could the difference be caused by an induced field in your probes? > 1KA at ~1mSec is a huge field to contend with. 200uSec rise time makes > things even more interesting. Physical routing of your wires might > reduce any problems of this nature as well. > > 6. Have you thought about "skin effect?" That makes life even more > interesting at high currents and itsy bitsy rise times. If you > calculate this for 60 HZ you'll be amazed at the difference it will > make > in the resistance of a wire with frequency. If you can do an FFT > analysis of your wave? Then take the highest significant harmonic > component and calculate the skin effect you might be in for a little > surprise. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect > > 7. 16 AWG copper wire has a DC resistance of 4.02 milli-ohms per foot. > Can you measure or estimate the length of your wire? > > 8. Can you take a comparable length of copper wire, stretched out > straight, and get the same or similar readings? > > 9. You're right about the timing of your pulse not being great enough > to cause serious heating. How about your duty cycle? > > 10. The TCR of copper is +0.39% per degree C at 20C. Not significant, > but still a factor. > > 11. Don't forget about your magnetic pulse and it's affect on item 5 > above. We built a small transformer impulse test system once that went > on a pilot line in the lab. They were supposed to build a steel > shielded room, but it wound up being copper as any normal RF screen > room > would be. Impulse testing is basically generating about a million > volts > then jumping an arc to the transformer to simulate a lightening > strike. > We struck that baby off the first time ... and blew up every > instrument > in the lab with the magnetic pulse. Did I mention that we only did > that > one time? > > I'm going to be gone for a couple of days but this ought to give you a > couple of days worth of experimentation. Let's see what results you > get > from the above and then look deeper if it's still a problem. > > REB > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Wire
2009-02-20 by Jim Wagner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.