Exactly my point. DLC David VanHorn wrote: >> Unless you are only trying to change a couple of constants in the code >> your odds of success here are pretty marginal. The code may not have >> been written in assembly, and assembly instructions are all that you >> will be able to read back. I've yet to see an assembly to C translator >> or assembly to Basic translator, depending upon the original language >> the developers used to create the code. > > Well, it's called a human being. :) > > Walk thru the asm, work out what's being done, and write new code. > You can also try to work out what parts are the variables that need > tweaking, if that's the problem. > > Question is, is it less expensive to just write it from scratch, > knowing where the I/Os are and what it's supposed to do? > > -- Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear. Thomas Jefferson ------------------------------------------------- Dennis Clark TTT Enterprises www.techtoystoday.com -------------------------------------------------
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] REVERSE ENGINEERING
2009-06-24 by dlc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.