--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Cosmin Buhu" <lists@b...> wrote: > Look what can be read on Olimex site: > " AVR-JTAG firmware upgrade for the > very first lot of AVR-JTAG (no -L > suffix), all JTAGs shipped after > 01.01.2004 are with fixed bootloader > and will upgrade automatically via > AVR-STUDIO " Ok, thanks Cosmin. That means although I purchased it recently (from SparkFun) it was an old one. It did not have the L suffix MCU, though it worked OK at 3.3V. So, strike one advantage of my clone over the Olimex. That leaves size, no desk space, measuring target voltage and good EMI design. --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Curtis" <plc@r...> wrote: > You might come a cropper with Atmel ... > I think they're wanting to protect their IP > Do you have Atmel's permission ... No, I don't have Atmel's permission, but I can't quite see what IP I'm stealing. My hardware design is adapted from information on the Web and in Atmel's publications. My bootloader is adapted from an Atmel application note and conforms to a published protocol. I looked for but did not find any language prohibiting running software delivered as part of AVR Studio on non-Atmel hardware. In fact, the license for AVR Studio allows re-distribution. Also, why would Atmel care where people get JTAG-ICE's from? They make tools because they couldn't sell chips if they didn't exist but I doubt that it's part of their profit model. Graham.
Message
Re: Olimex, roll-your own (was ... JTAG-ICE ...)
2004-06-18 by Graham Davies
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.