I'm curious just how they're tested, and is every unit tested before it goes out? I have never heard of that happening either. Zack On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Tim Mitchell <tim@sabretechnology.co.uk>wrote: > > > ----Original Message---- > From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com> > [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf > Of Roland > Jollivet Sent: 23 September 2009 14:49 To: > AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com <AVR-Chat%40yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: > [AVR-Chat] Re: > Mega128 apparently losing programming > > > It obviously sounds like they were never programmed in > > the first place. > > Maybe they slipped through. Is there any E^2 or RTC that > > was supposed to be programmed too? Is that there? > > Well that's how it sounds to me too. I think there must have been some > mixup somewhere along the line, as they are totally convinced that they > were all tested. There's no eeprom or anything to check, just flash and > fuse bits. Atmel say that while it would be theoretically possible to > "accidentally" generate a flash erase command by zapping the SPI pins, > there's no way you'd get the fuse bits going back to factory defaults > without specifically programming them to those settings (the application > settings are a lot different to the defaults). > > I just thought I would ask if anyone in the wider world had heard of > such a "memory loss" happening. > > -- > Tim Mitchell > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Mega128 apparently losing programming
2009-09-23 by Zack Widup
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.