Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Message

Re: [AVR-Chat] magazine

2009-12-21 by leon Heller

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave McLaughlin" <dave_mclaughlin@nerdshack.com>
To: <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:19 AM
Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat] magazine


> Hi Brian,
>
>
>
> I started off with the PIC myself. I chose it because I could buy a cheap
> starter kit and start programming it easily. I then started using it in my
> work place and we purchased an ICE for it. For hobby use I was finding
> debugging a major issue without the ICE and I started to look around for
> something else. We had been using the National Semi COP8 and that had a
> cheap emulator but the cost of the compiler put me off of it. I then
> discovered the AT902313 and I found that I could by a cheapish emulator, 
> the
> ICE200 and it could be used with the larger IC's like the 8515 at the 
> time.
> I then progressed to the Mega devices and bought the JTAG ICE and then
> finally the JTAG ICE Mk II and have never looked back. If you use the AVR
> devices without the ICE, then you will not want to do debugging without 
> one
> after you have. I know a lot of guys who programme without and put in 
> things
> like toggling IO pins to show position of code but when you want to check
> the value of a variable and don't have a STDIO to print to, you will soon
> see what I mean. What I am trying to say is that the AVR has some 
> excellent
> priced emulation tools that cover more devices than the PIC does.

That's not actually true. The $35 PICkit 2 programs and debugs all Microchip 
devcies except the PIC32.

Leon

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.