----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave McLaughlin" <dave_mclaughlin@nerdshack.com> To: <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:19 AM Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat] magazine > Hi Brian, > > > > I started off with the PIC myself. I chose it because I could buy a cheap > starter kit and start programming it easily. I then started using it in my > work place and we purchased an ICE for it. For hobby use I was finding > debugging a major issue without the ICE and I started to look around for > something else. We had been using the National Semi COP8 and that had a > cheap emulator but the cost of the compiler put me off of it. I then > discovered the AT902313 and I found that I could by a cheapish emulator, > the > ICE200 and it could be used with the larger IC's like the 8515 at the > time. > I then progressed to the Mega devices and bought the JTAG ICE and then > finally the JTAG ICE Mk II and have never looked back. If you use the AVR > devices without the ICE, then you will not want to do debugging without > one > after you have. I know a lot of guys who programme without and put in > things > like toggling IO pins to show position of code but when you want to check > the value of a variable and don't have a STDIO to print to, you will soon > see what I mean. What I am trying to say is that the AVR has some > excellent > priced emulation tools that cover more devices than the PIC does. That's not actually true. The $35 PICkit 2 programs and debugs all Microchip devcies except the PIC32. Leon
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] magazine
2009-12-21 by leon Heller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.