AVR-Chat

... And Microchip's developer support is second to none in my experience. 
Atmel, not so much - However, both have an experienced and chatting
developer support network in the form of "us".  :)  I like them both, and
use them both professionally.

DLC

> The hardware is not the only selection criteria, the required development
> tools, experience with the devices and already designed modules that can
> be used and intefaced quickly should also be classed as part of the
> expense. Time is "expensive" also.
> Â 
> Regards
>
>
> --- On Mon, 21/12/09, David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> wrote:
>
>
> From: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
> Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] magazine
> To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Monday, 21 December, 2009, 15:18
>
>
> Â 
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:06:41PM -0000, leon Heller wrote:
>>
>> Designers select a chip which gets the job done as cheaply and easily
>> as possible. In some situations it might be an AVR, in another it
>> might be PIC, or something else.
>
> Only *good* designers do that. Others have chip/vendor religion. When one
> is not willing to use any tool other than a hammer, all problems look
> like nails.
>
> --
> David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY. net
> ============ ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
> ======
> Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


-- 
Dennis Clark
TTT Enterprises