Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Message

Re: [AVR-Chat] ARM .vs. AVR

2010-11-28 by Jim Wagner

On Nov 28, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Leon Heller wrote:

> On 28/11/2010 21:02, John Samperi wrote:
> > At 06:45 AM 29/11/2010, you wrote:
> >> Rowley CrossWorks is streets ahead of AVR Studio.
> >
> > ..and a lot cheaper too....
>
> AVR Studio doesn't support ARM.
>
> The ease of use and additional features of CrossWorks means that
> companies using it will recoup the cost very quickly. The same IDE  
> is be
> used for ARM, MSP430 and AVR development.
>
> Leon
> -- 
> Leon Heller
> G1HSM
>
> 
A question -

Are the various ARM implementations consistent? That is, not only the  
core PC/ALU/memory but how ports and control registers are accessed?  
Are the internal peripherals consistent? That is, do we have the same  
registers with the same bit names in the same bit positions?

Is code written for one suplpier's ARM portable to other supplier's  
chips? Does it have to be recompiled to shift to another chip (with  
"same" features).

Thanks!
Jim Wagner
Oregon Research Electronics



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.