On Nov 28, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Leon Heller wrote: > On 28/11/2010 21:02, John Samperi wrote: > > At 06:45 AM 29/11/2010, you wrote: > >> Rowley CrossWorks is streets ahead of AVR Studio. > > > > ..and a lot cheaper too.... > > AVR Studio doesn't support ARM. > > The ease of use and additional features of CrossWorks means that > companies using it will recoup the cost very quickly. The same IDE > is be > used for ARM, MSP430 and AVR development. > > Leon > -- > Leon Heller > G1HSM > > A question - Are the various ARM implementations consistent? That is, not only the core PC/ALU/memory but how ports and control registers are accessed? Are the internal peripherals consistent? That is, do we have the same registers with the same bit names in the same bit positions? Is code written for one suplpier's ARM portable to other supplier's chips? Does it have to be recompiled to shift to another chip (with "same" features). Thanks! Jim Wagner Oregon Research Electronics [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] ARM .vs. AVR
2010-11-28 by Jim Wagner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.