Hmmm. It's beginning to sound like a crap-shoot. The device I'm specifically looking at protecting is an AVR uC, its I/O lines specifically. How would you do it, if I may ask? The environment is a boat one, basically an automobile one (engines, pumps, motors) with the added features of local radar, VHF and HF radio transmissions, as well as wireless computer and instrument transmissions. Lightning too. Shielded cables are a given, as is spike suppression on inductive loads. Thanks, Steve From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of wagnerj@proaxis.com Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 8:36 AM To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat] AVX Transguard You need to look at the tolerance specs. And, it depends, greatly, on what the connected electronics will tolerate. I just looked up the AVX parts, and they are spec'd a bit differently from some of the others. The 3.3V parts are rated for a 5.0V +/-20% breakdown. That means anywhere from 4.0V to 6.0V. with a "clamping" voltage of 12V at 1A. If you look at the V-I chart in the spec sheet, it shows that the 3.3V ones have a forward current of (about) 100ua at 3.3V, 1ma at 5V, 10ma at about 6V, 100ma at maybe 7V, and 1A at around 8V. So, they are NOT really "open" at 3.3V and not really breaking down at 5V. So, your other circuitry had better be able to handle more than 6V! The thing you will be relying on is that ESD has a pretty large source impedance (some K ohms for human body model) and a source capacitance of some 1000s of pf. Thus, the ability to source high currents is very limited. This is what saves the circuit, in the end. Jim ://www.eset.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [AVR-Chat] AVX Transguard
2011-01-06 by Steve Hodge
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.