Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Message

Re: [AVR-Chat] AVX Transguard

2011-01-08 by Jim Wagner

I missed the part about radios, radar, etc. So, in addition to  
transient protectors, liberal use of lossy ferrites (beads, etc) are  
strongly called for.

There really is no one technology that will handle the full spectrum  
of ESD, lighting, general conducted EMI, and RF through microwave. I  
am sure that I'm not the only one on the list who has been through  
this commercially. Its NOT a trivial task and its particularly  
difficult to do with confidence in the absence of testing. Lacking  
that, you are going to have to rely on your own interpretation of  
other's experiences and hope that you understand what is offered.

Jim Wagner
Oregon Research Electronics

On Jan 6, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Cat C wrote:

>
> Diodes?
>
> > To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com
> > From: steve@terrafirma.us
> > Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:10:34 -0800
> > Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat] AVX Transguard
> >
> > Hmmm. It's beginning to sound like a crap-shoot. The device I'm
> > specifically looking at protecting is an AVR uC, its I/O lines  
> specifically.
> > How would you do it, if I may ask? The environment is a boat one,
> > basically an automobile one (engines, pumps, motors) with the  
> added features
> > of local radar, VHF and HF radio transmissions, as well as  
> wireless computer
> > and instrument transmissions. Lightning too. Shielded cables are a  
> given,
> > as is spike suppression on inductive loads. Thanks, Steve
> >
> >
> >
> ..
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.