> From: Jim Wagner > > So, are the variables internally determined (for example, from sensors) while > the expression is entered by the user such that the symbols (T1, and so > forth) are just references to the internal variables? Exactly Jim, currently the configuration allows specifying several variables (i.e.: "if this track is occupied or that track is occupied set this signal to red") but I want to make it more flexible for the user by allowing them to specify an arbitrary logical expression involving an arbitrary number of inputs (typically track occupancy sensors but expandable to contact closures, etc.). Later I will extend the expression processing to support references to built-in functions such as: (T1 & VO(T2,1.2)) Where "VO(I,v)" returns true if the value of sensor "I" is greater than value "v". Once this mechanism is in place it opens up a lot of flexibility with minimum code investment on my part and, at the user level, makes it more "extensible". This allows the railroad signal controller to do things that I, the designer, didn't anticipate which has always been a goal of mine in my professional carrier as a software developer. Now, using microcontrollers, I have to accomplish it in a MUCH smaller container :-) Cheers, Chuck Hackett "Good judgment comes from experience, experience comes from bad judgment" 7.5" gauge Union Pacific Northern (4-8-4) 844 http://www.whitetrout.net/Chuck
Message
RE: [AVR-Chat] Simple Embedded Expression Evaluation
2012-11-26 by Chuck Hackett
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.