<snip> > >soil temperature and soil moisture will be very slow change variables > >so even with a time stamp, it would be a valid concept. > > Actually no, the idea as stated was that the signal started at one value > and went in a monotonic fashion to another (no up and downs) and therefor > the total number of samples could be computed in advance even if the time > span is not known. True, but it doesn't work for your inputs. > The extension suggested (basically a difference encoding) would work for > some of your inputs, but not for light I think we are agreeing that somethings like soil temperature, that will take hours to change under normal circumstances can be run thru a differential calculation and only when the answer is not zero, would it record the data. The only fast change I can forsee is watering. When one waters a plant, the soil temperature changes rapidly and with large variations from the previous point. > >as for light, this brings up an interesting study and probably one > >that will gain students interests and that is comparing the growth > >rate of identical plants in varying conditions. > > > >Will a tomato plant for instance, grow faster with 4 hours of direct > >sun or with 8 hours of the the same total light intensity ? > > More interestingly what effect is there if the 4 hours is distributed in > say 5 minute segments (ie 5 on 5 off)? Is that any different from 4 > on/4off at 8 at 50%. ah, the nature of research... who knows what the answer will be. Seems to be a simple project though. Dave
Message
Re: variable/constant input from a PC ?
2004-07-15 by Dave Mucha
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.