--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Kathy Quinlan <kat-yahoo@k...> wrote: > Graham Davies wrote: > > > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, Kathy Quinlan <kat-yahoo@k...> wrote: > > > > > >>I need a contact for a semi manufacturer > >>who can manufacter 2 devices for me: > >>#1 an 8 bit cpu that is FAST (think Gflops) (able to address 0.1TB) > >>#2 8 bit DDR (I need 10TB for the above cpu's) > > > > > > Kat, I would recommend TSMC for the CPU. You will need their 0.13 > > micron process with copper interconnect. Even then, you'll need a > > highly parallel design. Once you have the design complete, make sure > > you have a million dollars left for masks and the first fab run. > > > > For the DDR, I think you should save your second million bucks and > > use existing devices. Why do you need an 8-bit device? To get 10 TB > > you will have to stack up an awful lot of chips, so the width of each > > chip shouldn't be a major consideration. I trust you're not thinking > > you can get 10 TB on a single chip. > > > > This is not the sort of post I expected on this group, though I > > recognize you as a regular. Is there any chance you could divulge the > > application? In particular, if you need Gflops why are you > > constrained to an 8-bit CPU? I think you should be looking at 32- bit > > IP cores such as ARM, ARC, MIPS, TenSilica, etc. if not 64-bit. > > > > Graham. > > I have to process a text file that can be up to 10Tb in size, the data > is only ascii, so I can not see the point for a larger sized CPU. Once a > string is found, all it needs to do is hand the string up to the next > CPU for serving. > > This is not a joke Guys, I have someone who is paying me to design this > system, and speed is essential, so it has to be held in Ram. I do not > plan to have one CPU to search the whole 10Tb I was planing on using 100 > parallel CPU's each looking after 100Gb of ram. > > Kat. Could you just tell us what this thing is going to be used for? erikc
Message
Re: Semi manufacturers ?
2004-08-05 by erikc77099
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.