Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Message

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Semi manufacturers ?

2004-08-06 by erikc

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernd Felsche" <bernie@innovative.iinet.net.au>
To: <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 01:39
Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Semi manufacturers ?


> On Friday 06 August 2004 07:06, erikc wrote:
> > Well, if you want to develop semiconductors, why not a
RAM
> > chip with a simple processor built in?  The processor
would
> > have its own small RAM for holding its programmes and a
> > means of entering those programmes, causing them to run,
and
> > getting results off-chip.   You'd load all the little
CPU's
> > in parallel and let them loose, each one looking at the
data
> > on its own chip.  Now I'm not talking a CPU with some
RAM,
> > I'm talking 256 megabytes of RAM and maybe 4K of
entirely
> > separate RAM for the CPU's code.  Since you are
basically
> > using it to search for patterns, the CPU could be
optimised
> > for that.
> >
> > I actually think there might be a market for that kind
of
> > thing.
>
> You mean a large, secondary data cache on a simple
processor,
> or a CPU with mega-registers?

No, you're still stuck in the mindset of "CPU with RAM".
I'm having it the other way around.  A big DRAM with a
little CPU in one corner.  It's address pointers would be
whatever size needed to address the memory on that one chip.
Someone not knowing that there was a CPU inside could still
use the part as a "dumb" DRAM.

> There's still matter of partial matches spanning
boundaries.


Erikc  - firewevr@airmail.net
///
"An Fhirinne in aghaidh an tSaoil."
"The Truth against the World."
        -- Bardic Motto
///I did NOT lose my mind!  It's backed up on the server
(and the network's down....)

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.