More or less I agree with what Dave, Michael and Don have said. Let contribute the following. You did not mention what hardware you plan on using to program and/or test and/or use the mega128 in. If you have not already came up with what you will be using I suggest the STK501 (which will accomidate the 64 lead TQFP that the 128 can be purchased in) plugged into the STK500 (which supports the other AVRs and the STK501). This is because one of the hardest things for me in starting out is getting all the hardware and software working for that FIRST program. To program the 128 and other AVRs WinAVR C free. Both BasCom AVR and CodeVision AVR have free demos you can try out. Like said before "what language are you most farmiliar with?" If you are new to all of them probably Basic would be your best choice. I think most of us would say that C is more robust that Basic but it is also harder to learn. Also, there is always AVR Studio. I good ol assembly but when it comes down to it Studio is the definitive for programming AVRs and it is free. I'm sure some people will disagree with me but sooner or later you should know how to use Studio even if you program in one of the other languages. Because you are working with a megaAVR you need version 4. Mike --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, NGUYEN NGA VIET <vnn_hi@y...> wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I'm vnn, a beginner in microcontroller programming. I'm about to program an Atmega 128 and searching for a suitable tool. I've found two possible tools: WinAVR and ICC-avr. I found WinAVR first and started to learn to use it. Somebody suggested me to use ICC-avr. Please tell me: > - Which one, in your opinion, is better ( capacity and available resources) ? > > - Could you give me some advices for a beginner ? > > I'm glad to join our AVR community and thank you very much for you help. > > > vnn > > --------------------------------- > ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!
Message
Re: Beginner
2004-10-16 by brewski922
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.