On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 05:35:04PM -0000, arhodes19044 wrote: > > A man once said: "Documented bugs are features only when you want to > make lemonade." > > I doubt he was wise, because that man was me, just now. > > > --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, David Kelly <dkelly@h...> wrote: > > > > A wise man once taught me, "If its documented its not a bug, its a > > feature." You missed the point of wisdom. The point being that if its documented then one does not have an excuse for being tripped by what has been previously declared to be one of the operating conditions. Its well documented that if one sticks a finger in an AC outlet that one gets shocked. That is a feature, not a bug. If that feature bites then its your own fault because its a defined property of the system. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: documentation of timer interrupts vs bugs
2005-04-21 by David Kelly
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.