Changed it to a loop with test of a flag. Works fine. D ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Samperi" <samperi@ampertronics.com.au> To: <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 10:25 PM Subject: Re: Re: [AVR-Chat] Errors in manuals ... > At 12:26 PM 1/09/2005, you wrote: >>If you look at the RET and RETI instructions, the stack operations are the >>same, according to the manual. > > Which they are. > >>However, the RET does return to the >>instruction following the CALL > > Which is correct. > >>whereas the RETI returns to the instruction >>at point of interrupt. > > Which is incorrect. If I well remember you had > a RJMP LOOP so the next instruction is always > RJMP LOOP...as many of us pointed out...so it > will NEVER go past that point as you expected :-) > >>In the case of the RETI, after much debate and RTFM >>bull, you have to use a polled type of interrupt. > > You didn't have to. You would only have to change your > code at the RJMP LOOP to do some simple test and then exit > the loop. Again as some of us pointed out :-) > > > Regards > > John Samperi > > ****************************************************** > Ampertronics Pty. Ltd. > 11 Brokenwood Place Baulkham Hills, NSW 2153 AUSTRALIA > Tel. (02) 9674-6495 Fax (02) 9674-8745 > Email: samperi@ampertronics.com.au > Website http://www.ampertronics.com.au > * Electronic Design * Custom Products * Contract Assembly > ****************************************************** > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Re: [AVR-Chat] Errors in manuals ...
2005-09-01 by Dennis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.