On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 19:40:38 -0500 you wrote: >On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 20:07 -0700, Larry Barello wrote: >> Given that this is an AVR forum, not a PIC one, let me plug a product >> that I have found very useful: BASCOM. A free 4k limit compiler is >> available and supports most AVR chips. The BASIC dialect is plenty >> powerful, lots of library support (LCD, one wire, switches, AT >> keyboard, graphics displays, etc) and runs circles around anything >> Parallax has to offer. Full support (some specialized libraries and >> 128k limit) is $60, but I have never run out of space (granted I only >> use it for small quick projects). > > Only problem is I have never succeeded in getting anything to compile >in BASCM-AVR. Has some strange syntactical requirements for declaring >variables, apparently. I did contemplate Bascom when I started with AVRs. For me the quality, friendliness and helpfulness of support was important. I joined a few lists. I found the Bascom list unfriendly and somewhat dominated by characters I found distasteful. In contrast the CVAVR list was friendly, helpful and supportive. The ICCAVR list also seemed to be a helpful place. I haven't found Basic to be a particularly versatile language and avoid it whenever possible. As things stand I don't see an alternative to C/C++ . If there were a decent and inexpensive Forth compiler available I would probably have gone for that as I love screwing up my brain cells with RPN and still use my antique and beloved HP11C and HP16C calculators. -- Ralph Hilton http://www.ralphhilton.org C-Meter: http://www.cmeter.org FZAOINT http://www.fzaoint.net
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: (OT) PICAXE
2005-10-02 by Ralph Hilton
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.