Hello Ralph, I'm pretty much into C and assembly but done lots of other ones of a bygone era like Fortran Algol Basic and others but you mentioned Forth. In the last ATMEL journal #5 for Summer 2005 there was an article about qForth on page 46 to support their 4 bit family of MARC4 microcontrollers. Maybe there are other versions around. Might be something to ask your ATMEL contact and see what is available if you need such a compiler. Jim Hatley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ralph Hilton" <ralph@ralphhilton.org> To: <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 6:04 PM Subject: Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: (OT) PICAXE > On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 19:40:38 -0500 you wrote: > > >On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 20:07 -0700, Larry Barello wrote: > >> Given that this is an AVR forum, not a PIC one, let me plug a product > >> that I have found very useful: BASCOM. A free 4k limit compiler is > >> available and supports most AVR chips. The BASIC dialect is plenty > >> powerful, lots of library support (LCD, one wire, switches, AT > >> keyboard, graphics displays, etc) and runs circles around anything > >> Parallax has to offer. Full support (some specialized libraries and > >> 128k limit) is $60, but I have never run out of space (granted I only > >> use it for small quick projects). > > > > Only problem is I have never succeeded in getting anything to compile > >in BASCM-AVR. Has some strange syntactical requirements for declaring > >variables, apparently. > > I did contemplate Bascom when I started with AVRs. For me the quality, friendliness and > helpfulness of support was important. I joined a few lists. I found the Bascom list > unfriendly and somewhat dominated by characters I found distasteful. In contrast the CVAVR > list was friendly, helpful and supportive. The ICCAVR list also seemed to be a helpful > place. I haven't found Basic to be a particularly versatile language and avoid it whenever > possible. As things stand I don't see an alternative to C/C++ . If there were a decent and > inexpensive Forth compiler available I would probably have gone for that as I love > screwing up my brain cells with RPN and still use my antique and beloved HP11C and HP16C > calculators. > > > -- > Ralph Hilton > http://www.ralphhilton.org > C-Meter: http://www.cmeter.org > FZAOINT http://www.fzaoint.net > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: (OT) PICAXE
2005-10-02 by James Hatley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.