Yes - whatever works! Some years ago I rewrote some code I'd originally written for the Z-80 for an 8051. The 8051 actually seemed more versatile, even though the Z-80 had a larger instruction set. I recently rewrote some code originally for a PIC into AVR assembler. The AVR code came out about two-thirds the size of the PIC code. I got an ad sheet in the mail the other day from Dallas Semiconductor. It had data about a new microcontroller. It indicated they are the fastest microcontrollers on the market now, apparently far surpassing AVR's in speed. They do have some neat features, including on-chip DAC's as well as ADC's. But I' not ready to give up on AVR's yet. So it goes. Zack On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Dave Hylands wrote: > Hi Zack, > > > I'm not knocking the higher-level languages, it's just that I haven't > > really needed them myself. > > I work on a whole bunch of processors (AVR, ARM, PC) so being able to > share source code really helps. > > Different strokes for different folks :) > > -- > Dave Hylands
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat]
2005-10-27 by Zack Widup
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.