On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 21:23 +0000, Dave Mucha wrote: > > > A PIC with an 8 Mhz oscillator is giving you 2 MIPs (max) of > > performance. An AVR running with an 8 Mhz oscillator is giving you > 8 MIPs (max) of performance. (and this doesn't even consider the > horrible instruction set and architecture you have to deal with when > programming the PIC parts) AVRs are simply more flexible, more > powerful, and more easily programmable. > > Tom (who admits to be heavily biased) > OK, but, what is easiest to use for 6 I/O, 2 inputs and 4 outputs ? > I am thinking a stepper driver that sees a step input and a direction > input and then outputs to 4 MOSFETS ? > Tiny-11 says it can do 6, but what about the oscilator ? If I understand correctly, the ATTINY11 requires an external clock source of some sort (crystal, ceramic resonator, or R/C oscillator). As the ATTINY11 has but 8 pins on the package, you cannot achieve 6 I/Os while running it on a crystal. The ATTINY12 includes an internal calibrated oscillator that will run at approximately 1 Mhz. The ATTINY26 is a 20 pin device with 11 general purpose I/Os, and includes PWM capabilities. Both the ATTINY12 or the ATTINY26 are inexpensive, and all AVR processors are very easy to use. Tom (who is still biased, despite a very pleasant phone call from a Microchip rep who wants to send free samples. But what would I *DO* with them? I certainly do NOT waish to program them [I truly despise the PIC architecture])
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: cheap chips , no exteranl crystal, and timing
2005-11-20 by Thomas Keller
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.