Peter Jakacki wrote: > Russell Shaw wrote: > >>It is no different now than then. Back then, RS232 was run around and >>between buildings for terminals and mainframes. If you still want to >>run those distances, you'll want +/-15V. > > No, it is different and that is just the point. Nobody runs RS-232 > between buildings, do you? If we don't go as far as using fibre then we > would use a balanced line drive like RS-422, but never ever RS-232. Yes, > I still want to run those distance, but no, I am not stuck in the 60's > because I use RS-422/485 or some other means. I run rs232 from my workroom to the garage (30m). At my previous job, rs232 was run from the lab to various measuring equipment outside (10-20m). I know of several radio hams that run rs232 from their radio room to things outside and up radio towers (10-30m). RS232 was designed for unterminated lines which keeps things simple, especially for multi-drop star networks. RS485 requires a single backbone with terminator. RS232 can be fed thru radio coax and separated out with a filter, unlike rs485 which requires a balanced line. http://www.rs485.com/rs485spec.html RS485 requires three wires but rs232 only needs two.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: PC COM Ports
2005-12-17 by Russell Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.