Russell Shaw wrote: > Tom Becker wrote: > >> >> ... Unless you are making a unidirectional >> >>>>connection, you need at LEAST 3 wires for a proper RS232-C link. >>>>Ground, TX and RX. >>> >>>That's what i said before, unless the line is half-duplex. >> >>Do you mean unless the line is simplex? > > > Yes, for simplex which is one-way only, and half-duplex. > > Half duplex is when the ends alternate between being a transmitter > or receiver, using the same wire. You need tri-stateable transmitters > for that, and a software protocol. It's usually less hassle just to > use 3 wires and full duplex for 1:1 connections. For a multidrop > half-duplex network, the tristateable method can be used, but you > need to make your own higher current tristateable rs232 transmitters. > I've done that, but it's not very economical for component count and > RS485 would be better. I've also tried the dominant pull-down method > like i2c and canbus, but then that's hardly rs232 anymore. If you use a max3322, it is tristateable and has 1Meg input impedance, so you can do multidrop rs232 with standard drive-level transmitters. http://www.ferret.com.au/articles/67/0c012a67.asp
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: PC COM Ports
2005-12-18 by Russell Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.