That's fine, since it's a hobby endeavor. -----Original Message----- From: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rick Collins Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 8:05 AM To: AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com Subject: [AVR-Chat] Re: Thanks guys, I am up and running with BASCOM and ATSTK500 Ok, I won't tell you that C or assembler is better. But I will tell you that Forth is better... ;-) Although Basic may do what you want, it is not as easy to work with as is Forth. Check it out and you will see. --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "lcdpublishing" <lcdpublishing@...> wrote: > > No need to try and convince me that C or Assembler is better, I > already know that. > > However, given that I understand Basic, can use Basic to do the job at > hand, and don't have the time to devote to learning either C or > Assembler, Basic is my choice. > > If on the other hand, Basic couldn't do what I needed it to, I > probably wouldn't do the projects I want to, or, I would be forced > into learning the other languages, thus taking a lot longer for me to > get from A to B. > > So, spare me the lectures about C or Assembler, I would if I could. > > Thanks > > Chris > Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [AVR-Chat] Re: Thanks guys, I am up and running with BASCOM and ATSTK500
2006-02-07 by stevech
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.